Housing experiences

Exploring unhoused Angelenos’ living situations and interactions with the housing system

Last data pull: July, 2026

This page describes the housing experiences of PATHS participants, exploring where participants sleep, how their housing situations evolve over time, their experiences accessing shelter and housing, and what they want in a place to call home.

  • Sample. Analyses on this page uses the PATHS representative sample. See the Who participates page for details.
  • Missing responses. Responses of “prefer not to answer” or “don’t know” are left out of each percentage, so the share is out of people who answered.
  • Small groups. To avoid percentages based on very few people, time points and groups with too few responses are not shown. Each chart’s notes give the cutoff.

At a glance

  • Where people sleep. In the most recent month, 64% of participants were unsheltered, 16% were in a shelter, 12% were doubled up, in a hotel they paid for, or in an institution, and 8% were in their own home.
  • Month to month. Of participants who were unsheltered in one month, 89% were still unsheltered the next month. 4% had moved into a shelter and 1% into their own home. Of those in a shelter, 17% were unsheltered the following month.
  • Connection to the housing system. When they enrolled, 57% of participants were not on a housing waitlist and had never been offered housing while unhoused in LA.
  • Housing offers. In a typical month, 10% of participants said an outreach or government worker had offered them housing in the past 30 days. The type offered most often was “Temporary stay in a motel/hotel-like setting” (included in 26% of offers).
  • What people want. The housing options participants were most interested in were “Supportive housing” (57%) and “Temporary stay in a motel/hotel-like setting” (56%). By comparison, 5% were interested in congregate shelter, which was included in 20% of offers. The barriers to accepting shelter or housing cited most often were “Lack of privacy” (57%) and “Unsafe” (53%).

Where people sleep

Where participants spent the night, broken out into unsheltered (including sleeping rough, in a tent, or in a vehicle), sheltered, staying doubled up with family or friends, a hotel the person paid for themselves, an institution, and their own home.

Most recent month

Hover over a bar to see the breakdown by race, sex, and age.

People in an institution (e.g. a hospital or jail) are counted in the total but not shown as a separate bar because there are very few of them, so the bars add up to slightly less than 100%.

Over time

Share of participants in each situation, by calendar quarter. Because new participants keep joining the study, some of the change over time reflects who has recently joined, not only changes in people’s circumstances. Quarters with fewer than 20 responses are not shown, and a quarter appears only once all three of its months are in the data.

The same breakdown, shown separately by recruitment year (the year each participant was recruited into PATHS, shown on the left) and plotted by months since each person enrolled instead of calendar date. Month 0 is everyone’s first survey and month 6 is six months later, whenever that was. This separates changes in people’s circumstances after joining the study from differences between people recruited in different years. Months with fewer than 20 responses are not shown.

Unsheltered situations by area

Among participants who were unsheltered, the share sleeping rough, in a tent, or in a vehicle, by year, in each of LA County’s eight Service Planning Areas (SPAs). Each bar adds up to 100% of unsheltered survey responses in that area and year; bars with fewer than 10 responses are not shown. Hover for percentages in each SPA and year.

The same breakdown for the 15 City of Los Angeles Council Districts, with the same 10-response cutoff. Hover for percentages in each district and year.

Month-to-month transitions

How often does someone’s housing situation change from one month to the next? Each chart compares a participant’s situation in one monthly survey with their situation in the next one, from 2023 onward. Situations are grouped into four categories: unsheltered, sheltered, precariously housed (doubled up with family or friends, in a hotel the person paid for, or in an institution), and own home. For changes over a longer period, see Trajectories over the first year.

Of participants who were unsheltered in one month, 89% were still unsheltered the next month. The right panel shows where the rest went. The two panels use different scales. Hover for percentages.

Of participants who were in a shelter in one month, 74% were still in a shelter the next month. The right panel shows where the rest went. The two panels use different scales. Hover for percentages.

Full tables for the charts above, including people who stayed in the same situation, plus the same comparison starting from each specific kind of unsheltered or sheltered situation.

Characteristic Overall
N = 107171
2023
N = 14311
2024
N = 23201
2025
N = 42921
2026
N = 26741
Unsheltered housing transitions




    Stayed unsheltered 89.2% 88.5% 89.4% 89.6% 88.8%
    Moved to sheltered 4.3% 5.2% 4.3% 4.1% 4.4%
    Moved to precariously housed 5.7% 5.6% 5.3% 5.6% 6.2%
    Moved to own home 0.7% 0.7% 0.9% 0.8% 0.6%
1
Characteristic Overall
N = 22241
2023
N = 3711
2024
N = 4701
2025
N = 7871
2026
N = 5961
Sheltered housing transitions




    Moved to unsheltered 17.0% 18.9% 17.7% 16.3% 16.4%
    Stayed sheltered 74.0% 70.9% 71.9% 76.1% 74.8%
    Moved to precariously housed 5.4% 5.7% 6.0% 4.7% 5.5%
    Moved to own home 3.6% 4.6% 4.5% 2.9% 3.2%
1
Characteristic Overall
N = 33571
2023
N = 4221
2024
N = 7081
2025
N = 13181
2026
N = 9091
Rough sleeping transitions




    Stayed rough sleeping 67.4% 63.3% 66.1% 67.3% 70.3%
    Moved to tent 12.6% 12.6% 13.3% 13.7% 10.6%
    Moved to vehicle 6.4% 7.1% 6.6% 7.1% 4.8%
    Moved to congregate shelter 2.3% 2.6% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3%
    Moved to non-congregate shelter 3.3% 4.5% 3.2% 2.6% 4.0%
    Moved to doubled-up 5.2% 5.7% 6.1% 4.6% 5.3%
    Moved to self-paid hotel 1.6% 2.4% 1.3% 1.6% 1.5%
    Moved to institution 0.6% 0.9% 0.4% 0.5% 0.7%
    Moved to own home 0.6% 0.9% 0.7% 0.5% 0.6%
1
Characteristic Overall
N = 20201
2023
N = 2761
2024
N = 4151
2025
N = 8211
2026
N = 5081
Tent transitions




    Moved to rough sleeping 20.8% 19.2% 21.0% 21.9% 19.7%
    Stayed in tent 62.5% 61.6% 62.7% 60.5% 66.1%
    Moved to vehicle 5.1% 5.1% 5.5% 5.1% 4.9%
    Moved to congregate shelter 1.8% 2.5% 1.7% 1.7% 1.6%
    Moved to non-congregate shelter 3.9% 5.1% 2.2% 5.0% 2.8%
    Moved to doubled-up 3.8% 4.3% 4.6% 3.5% 3.3%
    Moved to self-paid hotel 0.9% 1.8% 0.5% 0.9% 1.0%
    Moved to institution 0.5% 0.4% 1.0% 0.6% 0.2%
    Moved to own home 0.6% 0.0% 1.0% 0.7% 0.4%
1
Characteristic Overall
N = 53371
2023
N = 7341
2024
N = 11961
2025
N = 21521
2026
N = 12551
Vehicle transitions




    Moved to rough sleeping 4.5% 4.5% 4.2% 5.1% 3.9%
    Moved to tent 1.7% 1.4% 2.2% 1.7% 1.6%
    Stayed in vehicle 85.5% 87.2% 85.9% 84.9% 85.2%
    Moved to congregate shelter 0.5% 0.7% 0.7% 0.4% 0.5%
    Moved to non-congregate shelter 1.9% 1.9% 2.2% 1.8% 2.1%
    Moved to doubled-up 3.2% 2.7% 2.3% 3.4% 4.1%
    Moved to self-paid hotel 1.3% 0.4% 1.3% 1.3% 1.6%
    Moved to institution 0.4% 0.4% 0.1% 0.5% 0.4%
    Moved to own home 1.0% 0.8% 1.3% 1.0% 0.7%
1
Characteristic Overall
N = 5161
2023
N = 891
2024
N = 1021
2025
N = 1931
2026
N = 1321
Congregate shelter transitions




    Moved to rough sleeping 15.1% 13.5% 17.6% 15.0% 14.4%
    Moved to tent 5.4% 7.9% 2.9% 5.2% 6.1%
    Moved to vehicle 5.0% 3.4% 4.9% 7.3% 3.0%
    Stayed in congregate shelter 48.1% 44.9% 48.0% 52.3% 43.9%
    Moved to non-congregate shelter 19.8% 21.3% 19.6% 15.0% 25.8%
    Moved to doubled-up 3.3% 5.6% 2.0% 3.1% 3.0%
    Moved to self-paid hotel 0.6% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5%
    Moved to institution 0.4% 0.0% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0%
    Moved to own home 2.3% 2.2% 3.9% 1.6% 2.3%
1
Characteristic Overall
N = 16081
2023
N = 2651
2024
N = 3411
2025
N = 5541
2026
N = 4481
Noncongregate shelter transitions




    Moved to rough sleeping 6.1% 7.5% 5.3% 5.1% 7.1%
    Moved to tent 3.1% 3.4% 2.1% 4.0% 2.7%
    Moved to vehicle 4.4% 4.9% 5.9% 3.4% 4.2%
    Moved to congregate shelter 6.7% 7.9% 5.3% 6.1% 7.6%
    Stayed in non-congregate shelter 70.3% 65.7% 70.1% 73.3% 69.4%
    Moved to doubled-up 3.0% 3.0% 3.8% 3.1% 2.5%
    Moved to self-paid hotel 1.3% 1.1% 2.1% 0.5% 1.8%
    Moved to institution 1.2% 0.8% 1.5% 1.1% 1.6%
    Moved to own home 3.9% 5.7% 4.1% 3.4% 3.1%
1

Every combination of last month’s situation (across) and this month’s situation (down), pooled across all years (including before 2023). Bigger circles mean more people; circles on the diagonal are people whose situation did not change. Hover for counts and percentages.

Trajectories over the first year

Month-to-month changes shows how often things change from one month to the next. This section looks at the bigger picture: where participants started, every situation they passed through, and where they were after their first 12 months in the study. It includes participants who completed at least 6 monthly surveys in that time.

How to read it. The left column shows where people were when they enrolled, and the right column shows where they were at the end of the year. The middle column shows every situation each person was in at some point during the year. Someone who moved between situations is counted in each one, so the middle column adds up to more than the total number of people. Numbers are counts of people.

The same diagram, with shelter split into congregate shelter (emergency shelter or rec center) and non-congregate shelter (bridge or transitional housing, motel or hotel, small house, tiny home).

Participants who were sleeping in a vehicle when they enrolled.

Participants who were unsheltered but not in a vehicle (for example, sleeping outside or in a tent) when they enrolled.

Connection to the housing system

How connected were participants to the housing system when they joined the study? Each participant falls into one of three groups:

  • On waitlist: currently on a housing waitlist
  • Offered, not on waitlist: not on a waitlist, but has been offered housing at some point while homeless in LA
  • Not on waitlist, not offered: neither

Shelter & housing offers

Unlike the section above, this is a monthly measure assess during follow-up. In each monthly survey, participants are asked whether an outreach or government worker offered them housing in the past 30 days, and if so, what kind. The survey began asking this in October 2023. Percentages are shares of monthly surveys. Offers made during encampment sweeps are covered on the Encampment sweeps page.

How often people are offered housing

In any given month, 10% of participants reported being offered housing by an outreach or government worker in the past 30 days. The rate went from 15% in the first six months the question was asked to 8% in the most recent six months.

Share of monthly surveys in which the participant reported a housing offer in the past 30 days, by quarter (15,250 surveys). Larger points mean more surveys that quarter, and the solid line shows the overall trend. Boxed labels show the rate in the first six and most recent six months.

Types of housing offered

When participants were offered housing, what kind was it?

Based on 1,598 monthly surveys in which a participant reported a housing offer. One offer can include more than one type, so shares add up to more than 100%.

The share of offers that included each type, by quarter. Larger points mean more offers that quarter. The dotted line connects the quarterly values and the solid line shows the overall trend. Boxed labels show shares in the first six and most recent six months. All panels use the same scale.

What participants want

What participants said they would want, what they would need for a placement to work, and what keeps them from accepting shelter or housing, assessed at enrollment. People could choose more than one answer, so percentages add up to more than 100%.

Which housing or shelter options would participants be interested in receiving?

What features of housing or shelter would participants need to make a placement workable for them?

What participants identified as barriers to accepting shelter or housing offers.